|
Poster:
|
rastamon |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 05:58:57am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
and a good morning to you! (all and any female milk sacks are so VERY overated, except if you're 1-2yrs old)
|
Poster:
|
Finster Baby |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 06:18:11am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
I believe the saying is "Football, Titties and Beer, oh my".....:-)
Titties aside....that is a very pretty girl...
|
Poster:
|
William Tell |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 06:48:14am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
Alright, what's going on here?
What if Miss D pops over? Hmmm--do web sites possess "directionality"? Since she is over there and we are here I mean...? Not sure.
Anyway, it seems somehow especially juvenile and sexist, and though I participated in the ooogling of JAlba, well...okay...damn it.
I dunno. But really...what is the point? At least Alba had a point in the context of the moment...
|
Poster:
|
direwolf0701 |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 07:03:53am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
Meaghan Fox would have been better :)
(hope Marie isnt reading this one - lol)
|
Poster:
|
user unknown |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 09:07:35am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
|
Poster:
|
direwolf0701 |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 09:16:57am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
bill, you are a true friend :)
|
Poster:
|
user unknown |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 09:20:41am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM |
|
Poster:
|
dead-head_Monte |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 09:12:20am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree! |
fyi — this doc is located directly above the log-in box when you "join us"
The Internet Archive Terms of Use — 10 March 2001 — 3rd Paragraph
Some of the content available through the Archive may be governed by local, national, and/or international laws and regulations, and your use of such content is solely at your own risk. You agree to abide by all applicable laws and regulations, including intellectual property laws, in connection with your use of the Archive. In particular, you certify that your use of any part of the Archive's Collections will be noncommercial and will be limited to noninfringing or fair use under copyright law. In using the Archive's site, Collections, and/or services, you further agree (a) not to violate anyone's rights of privacy, (b) not to act in any way that might give rise to civil or criminal liability, (c) not to use or attempt to use another person's password, (d) not to collect or store personal data about anyone, (e) not to infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other proprietary rights of any person, (f) not to transmit or facilitate the transmission of unsolicited email ("spam"), (g) not to harass, threaten, or otherwise annoy anyone, and (h) not to act in any way that might be harmful to minors, including, without limitation, transmitting or facilitating the transmission of child pornography, which is prohibited by federal law and may be reported to the authorities should it be discovered by the Archive.
I believe we have a huge amount of priveleges here
how about re-visiting Anchorage
for this Sugaree beauty
|
Poster:
|
user unknown |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 05:07:05pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree! |
Monte you highlighted the section referring to child pornography. Sure you are not suggesting the picture in question is of an underage girl. I have learned that one must be very careful when using the word child in conjunction with the word pornography. That combination tends to bring the "witch burners" out of the woodwork. Now don't get me wrong were this truly a case of "kiddie porn", I would be the man lighting the torches.
Well I guess I just violated section G of the IA ToU. Sorry to be annoying, but I have witnessed the "feeding frenzy" the inacurate use of the term "child pornography" can create. And believe me, it IS NOT pretty.
|
Poster:
|
rastamon |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 06:26:04pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree! |
uuuuhhh...so i take it, she's under 18?? (the sugaree beauty)
well, i won't be fooled again!
"She was fifteen years old, going on thirty-five, Doc, and she told me she was eighteen, she was very willing, I practically had to take to sewing my pants shut. Between you and me, uh, she might have been fifteen, but when you get that little red beaver right up there in front of you, I don't think it's crazy at all and I don't think you do either. No man alive could resist that, and that's why I got into jail to begin with. And now they're telling me I'm crazy over here because I don't sit there like a goddamn vegetable. Don't make a bit of sense to me. If that's what being crazy is, then I'm senseless, out of it, gone-down-the-road, wacko. But no more, no less, that's it".
|
Poster:
|
user unknown |
Date:
|
March 31, 2009 06:45:06pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree! |
No rasta, the "Sugaree beauty" is definitely of legal age. I am sure Monte would not have posted her picture if she weren't. However it seemed as if Monte was accusing GFY of posting an underage girl(the "Big Smile" girl...you know, the one with titties). I don't think she is underage either, but I have been wrong about those things before. I was more concerned with the (hopefully)erroneous "child pornography" reference.
TVNews
OpenLibrary
